A local PT may operate lawfully as a wholly Indonesian-owned company today. It can become unlicensable the moment its shares pass to a foreign buyer.
In this article, we discuss the PMDN to PMA conversion due diligence checks a foreign buyer should run before signing. It covers KBLI-by-KBLI eligibility under the Positive Investment List. It also covers AHU-versus-OSS record matching, PMA capital rules, LKPM history and the statutory acquisition process. The aim is to price the transaction on verified facts rather than the seller's representations.
Why Does PMDN to PMA Conversion Due Diligence Start With the Business Lines?
The first and most consequential gate is KBLI-by-KBLI eligibility. A company that lawfully operates as a local PT may be off-limits to the intended foreign ownership percentage.
Under Indonesia's investment framework, foreign-entry eligibility is tested activity by activity. It is not tested company by company. The Positive Investment List is set by Presidential Regulation No. 10 of 2021. Presidential Regulation No. 49 of 2021 amends it. Sector-specific regulations may add further conditions on top of it (as of 11 October 2026).
The licensing architecture has also moved. Government Regulation No. 28 of 2025 replaced Government Regulation No. 5 of 2021. The new regulation is the risk-based business-licensing framework. Regulation of the Minister of Investment (Permeninves/BKPM) No. 5 of 2025 governs OSS procedures under that framework.
For readers new to this area: KBLI is the business classification code. NIB is the business identification number. AHU is the legal-administration registry. OSS is the licensing portal. LKPM is the investment activity report.
The screen is administered through the Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) and the OSS system. However, selecting a KBLI in OSS does not alone prove foreign-investment eligibility. Buyers should test every active and planned five-digit KBLI. They should check it against current investment-field rules and sector rules. They should repeat that check before signing and again before closing. The outcome is always activity-, ownership-, sector- and location-specific.
In practice, the team's screening work focuses on five questions for each business line:
- Whether the intended foreign ownership percentage is capped for that KBLI.
- Whether the activity is reserved for Indonesian nationals or requires an Indonesian partner.
- Whether minimum qualifications, personnel or facility conditions attach to the activity.
- Whether combining several activities in one company is permitted.
- Whether each project location triggers additional conditions.
The deal pattern is consistent. A target may hold a perfectly valid NIB as a local company. The buyer's intended percentage may then hit a cap, qualification, capital or location condition. That condition was never priced into the negotiation.
How Do You Reconstruct the Target's Corporate and Licensing Records?
You reconstruct the record from several sources. These are the corporate chain, the OSS profile, sector approvals, contracts, tax, employment, litigation, land and LKPM filings.
Once eligibility is established, rebuild the target's legal and operational record from its own sources. The matrix below is a recommended diligence method. It is not a statutory checklist. Final document lists should be settled with Indonesian corporate counsel.
The starting point is the corporate chain. Collect these documents:
- The establishment deed.
- Every amendment and share-transfer deed.
- Ministry approvals or acknowledgements.
- GMS and board resolutions.
- Director and commissioner appointments.
- Share certificates.
- Beneficial-owner filings.
- Any pledge or security documents.
Read this chain against the OSS profile. The OSS profile includes the NIB. It also includes all registered KBLIs and locations. It includes risk classifications, investment values, business-licensing status and certificates. It includes any warnings or supervisory correspondence.
The buyer should then examine a wider scope:
- Share ownership, transfers and issuances.
- GMS authority, shareholder and special registers, and security interests.
- Contracts, tax history, employment records, litigation and land rights.
- Underlying sector licences, environmental approvals, spatial confirmations and building approvals.
- The investment plan and every quarterly LKPM filing, reconciled against accounting records.
1. Corporate records under the AHU system
The deeds and corporate filings accepted by the Ministry of Law establish who validly owns and governs the company. Every later record — the cap table, the OSS profile, bank mandates — is tested against this chain.
2. The OSS and NIB profile
The NIB shows what the company has registered to do, where, at what risk rating and with what investment plan. It does not, by itself, prove that every underlying licence exists or remains valid.
3. Underlying licences and location approvals
Sector licences, spatial approvals, environmental approvals and building approvals are issued by different authorities and often tied to a specific facility, so they must be collected separately and checked at each actual location.
4. Commercial, employment, tax and litigation exposure
Change-of-control clauses, pending disputes, unpaid withholdings and land title defects all survive the share transfer, because the company — not the seller — carries them.
5. Investment-plan and LKPM history
The target's reported investment realization shapes what the buyer can file after closing, so it must be tied to financial statements, fixed assets and funding evidence.
Pre-Signing Document Matrix for a Candidate PT
| Record set | Source system or authority | Key cross-check |
|---|---|---|
| Establishment deed, amendments, share-transfer deeds, GMS and board resolutions | Notary and Ministry of Law records (AHU) | Continuity of corporate authority from incorporation to the latest accepted deed |
| NIB, registered KBLIs, locations, risk classification, investment values, licensing status | Online Single Submission (OSS) | Consistency with the articles of association and actual operations |
| Sector licences, spatial approvals, environmental approvals, building approvals | Issuing ministries and regional authorities | Validity at each actual project location and facility |
| Shareholder register, special register, share certificates, beneficial-owner filings | Company books and the AHU profile | Agreement with the deed capital and the cap table |
| Quarterly LKPM filings and realization by business field and location | OSS / BKPM | Support by financial statements, fixed assets and funding evidence |
What Does an AHU-Versus-OSS Mismatch Tell the Buyer?
An AHU-versus-OSS mismatch is a diligence flag. It requires validation or correction before closing. It is not proof of invalidity or illegality.
Indonesia runs two parallel registries that must agree. The Directorate General of General Legal Administration (AHU) holds corporate legal data. It sits under the Ministry of Law. The Online Single Submission (OSS) system holds business licensing and investment data. In team reviews, the useful findings come from reconciling the two. Treat any mismatch as a flag to resolve. Never treat it as an automatic legal conclusion.
Two KBLI mismatches commonly need attention. The first is a KBLI registered in the NIB but absent from the articles of association. That may indicate the company lacks corporate authority for the activity. It is a legal-review issue. It may require a purposes-and-objectives amendment. The second is an activity stated in the articles but absent from OSS. That activity may lack the required operational licensing record. Confirm both findings against the actual deeds and OSS output before drawing a conclusion.
More broadly, identify which licences and approvals are tied to the company. Check the activity, location, facility, qualification or quota. Check the ownership composition and change-of-control triggers. An NIB does not settle every underlying licensing issue. Avoid blanket language such as licences transfer. Identify the authority and rule behind each material licence individually.
Common AHU-OSS Mismatches and What They Suggest
| Observed mismatch | Possible implication | Recommended action |
|---|---|---|
| AHU shows a new director; OSS still names the former director | Filings and licences signed after the appointment may need validation | Correct the OSS profile and validate affected licences |
| Deed capital and OSS capital figures differ | The investment plan and risk-based licences may rest on stale capital data | Reconcile before modelling PMA compliance |
| A KBLI appears in the NIB but not in the articles of association | The company may lack corporate authority for that activity | Legal review, and possibly a purposes-and-objectives amendment |
| A KBLI appears in the articles but not in OSS | The activity may lack its operational licensing record | Obtain the licence before relying on the activity |
| A project location appears in LKPM but not in the NIB | Possible unregistered operations at that location | Regularise the location or exclude it from the deal |
| A licence address differs from the lease, spatial confirmation or facility | A location-dependent approval cannot simply be relied upon | Verify spatial and building evidence at the actual site |
What PMA Investment Requirements Apply After the Conversion?
Under Permeninves/BKPM No. 5 of 2025, two general rules apply. Total investment must exceed IDR 10 billion per business field and project location. Paid-up capital must be at least IDR 2.5 billion per company.
Permeninves/BKPM No. 5 of 2025 Article 26 sets the general PMA minimum-investment threshold. Total investment must be more than IDR 10 billion. Land and buildings are excluded. The rule applies per five-digit KBLI business field and per project location. It is subject to stated exceptions. It is also subject to stricter rules in other laws.
The same article provides special calculations or aggregation treatments for certain activities. These include:
- Wholesale trade.
- Food and beverage services.
- Construction.
- One production line of industrial products.
- Property.
- EV charging stations.
- Certain KEK (special economic zone) activities.
These treatments differ clause by clause. Advisers should check the exact provision that matches the target's KBLI, location and business model. Do not apply a generic aggregation assumption.
Article 26(10) separately fixes the minimum issued and paid-up capital. It is IDR 2.5 billion per limited liability company. Another law may provide otherwise. This is a capital rule. It is not the total-investment requirement. A stricter sector-specific rule can still apply. Readers comparing structures can read our related guide on the minimum capital of a PT PMA in Indonesia.
Article 27 adds a stability rule. Paid-up capital generally may not be moved out of the company's bank account for at least 12 months. Exceptions cover permitted asset purchases, building construction and company operations. The 12-month restriction is made through an OSS self-declaration. In a share acquisition, the price paid to the seller is not qualifying project investment. Counsel must verify funding evidence, timing and permitted use. Do not assume the target's investment plan will satisfy PMA thresholds.
Key PMA Investment Rules Under Permeninves/BKPM No. 5 of 2025
| Requirement | General rule | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Total investment | More than IDR 10 billion per five-digit KBLI and project location, excluding land and buildings | Subject to statutory exceptions and special calculations for activities such as wholesale trade, food and beverage services, construction, property and EV charging stations |
| Minimum issued and paid-up capital | IDR 2.5 billion per limited liability company | A stricter sector-specific rule may apply; this is separate from the total-investment requirement |
| Capital stability | Paid-up capital generally not withdrawn from the company account for at least 12 months | Exceptions cover asset purchases, building construction and company operations, with an OSS self-declaration |
| Foreign ownership | Determined per KBLI under the Positive Investment List | Sector rules may add partner, qualification or location conditions |
What Should a Buyer Verify in the Target's LKPM History?
LKPM history can expose a buyer to unsupported inherited investment data. Medium and large businesses file quarterly through OSS by 15 April, 15 July, 15 October and 15 January.
The LKPM is the periodic investment activity report. Medium and large businesses file it through OSS. Permeninves/BKPM No. 5 of 2025 sets this duty. For a buyer, the target's LKPM history is a compliance record. It can also create exposure after closing. The converted company's next report must stand on inherited investment data. Investigate any unsupported realization before carrying it into the buyer's first report.
The recommended buyer-side risk assessment compares two sets of data. First, compare the target's investment plan and historic LKPM realization with its accounting records. Second, compare them with fixed assets, funding evidence and actual project locations. Do this before assuming PMA compliance. This is risk assessment, not an assertion that a discrepancy automatically creates a penalty or invalidates a licence. Investigate discrepancies. Never carry unsupported figures into the buyer's first filing. Where the target's accounts need review, 3E Accounting Indonesia also provides statutory financial auditing and reporting services in Indonesia.
In Indonesia LKPM diligence, the team looks for three patterns:
- Realization figures that exceed what the financial statements support.
- Land and building values counted inconsistently against investment exclusions.
- Project locations that appear in LKPM filings but not in the NIB.
Each is a flag. It needs documentary evidence before the figures are accepted.
What Statutory Steps Does the Company Law Require for the Acquisition?
Where applicable, the acquisition process can include shareholder approval. It may also include employee and newspaper notice, a creditor-objection window, notarial documentation and notification to the Minister.
A share acquisition changes control of the existing PT. It does not create a new legal entity. The Company Law defines acquisition as a share acquisition that transfers control. The company survives with its history, contracts and liabilities.
Where the statutory acquisition provisions apply, the process can include several steps:
- Approval by the general meeting of shareholders (GMS).
- Notice to employees and publication in a newspaper at least 30 days before the GMS is called.
- A 14-day window for creditors to object.
- Documentation by notarial deed.
- Notification to the Minister.
These steps apply where applicable. Indonesian corporate counsel must determine whether a particular direct share transfer triggers each step. That determination should be made before drafting the sale and purchase agreement.
Survival of the company does not mean survival of every licence. Continuity depends on the relevant licence and sector rule. The buyer's conditions precedent should capture licence continuity explicitly. On the tax side, the company's tax identification numbers (NPWP) continue. Verify registrations, VAT status and withholding history before closing.
When Is Buying a Local PT Preferable to Incorporating a New PT PMA?
Buying an existing PT is commercially preferable only in one situation. The continuing legal entity must have material value that a new PT PMA cannot efficiently recreate.
The decision framework the team applies is straightforward: a purchase makes sense where the target's operating history, contracts, facilities, workforce or approvals carry real value and remain usable after a change-of-control review. Where they do not, a new PT PMA can offer a cleaner liability perimeter. This may be so where key licences will not survive new ownership or the KBLI screen caps the buyer at a minority position. The trade-off is building the corporate and licensing structure from scratch. Our guide to company registration in Indonesia walks through that alternative route.
The right choice always depends on transaction structure, contracts, licences, employees, tax and other liabilities, and it should follow — not precede — the legal and tax review. This is a commercial judgement, not a promise that any particular approval will continue; each material licence must be tested against its own authority and rule.
What Should the Buyer Align Between Signing and the First LKPM?
The recommended closing-to-first-LKPM plan is to align several records. Align corporate records, OSS data, licences, responsible persons, investment information and the first required report.
The period between signing and the first post-closing LKPM is best used to bring every record system into agreement. This is a recommended buyer-side plan. It is not a mandated workflow.
The sequence that works in practice is:
- Complete corporate amendments and file director, commissioner and shareholder changes.
- Correct the OSS profile to reflect ownership, investment plan, KBLIs, locations and responsible persons.
- Regularise or reissue licences flagged as location-, qualification- or control-dependent, with evidence.
- Reconcile post-closing capital, assets and funding evidence for the first LKPM.
- Confirm the reporting calendar and responsibility for the first filing.
Post-Closing Compliance Calendar for a Converted PT PMA
| Obligation | Deadline | Authority |
|---|---|---|
| LKPM investment activity report (medium and large businesses) | 15 April, 15 July, 15 October and 15 January | BKPM via OSS |
| PPh 25 corporate instalment | 15th of each month | Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) |
| PPh 21 and PPh 23 withholding returns | 20th of the following month | Coretax DJP |
| VAT periodic return | Last day of the following month | DJP |
| Annual corporate income tax return | 30 April for calendar-year entities (22 percent standard rate in 2026) | DJP |
| Annual GMS ratifying the annual report | Within six months of fiscal year end | Company Law |
Conclusion
Buying a local PT is not a shortcut around Indonesia's foreign-investment rules. It is a diligence exercise. The company's legal, licensing and reporting history is inherited along with its assets. Key checks should be settled as conditions precedent. These include KBLI eligibility, AHU-versus-OSS alignment, licence continuity, PMA capital thresholds and LKPM reconciliation.
3E Accounting Indonesia is a Corporate Services Provider. It supports foreign buyers throughout this process. Its support can include:
- Pre-signing KBLI and licence screening.
- Corporate and registry reconciliation.
- Acquisition documentation with Indonesian counsel.
- OSS and AHU filings after closing.
- The first LKPM submission under new ownership.
Our team combines local regulatory knowledge with the reach of the 3E Accounting International Network. That network spans more than 110 countries.
If you are weighing a PMDN to PMA conversion, speak with our team before you sign. A structured due diligence review is the cheapest insurance on an Indonesian acquisition. Contact us to scope the checks your target actually needs.
Scope Your Indonesian PT Acquisition With Our Team
Tell us the target, the intended ownership percentage and the business lines, and we will outline the diligence gates that apply to your transaction.
Frequently Asked Questions
No. A share acquisition transfers control of the same legal entity; the company survives. PT PMA status follows from the foreign ownership under the investment rules, and each licence must be reviewed for change-of-control conditions before closing.
No. Foreign ownership limits are set per five-digit KBLI under Presidential Regulation No. 10 of 2021 as amended by Presidential Regulation No. 49 of 2021, and sector rules may add partner, qualification or location conditions. The result is activity-, ownership-, sector- and location-specific.
Under Permeninves/BKPM No. 5 of 2025 Article 26(10), the general minimum issued and paid-up capital is IDR 2.5 billion per limited liability company, unless another law provides otherwise. This is separate from the general total-investment threshold of more than IDR 10 billion per business field and project location.
LKPM is the quarterly investment activity report that medium and large businesses file through OSS, with current deadlines of 15 April, 15 July, 15 October and 15 January. After closing, the buyer inherits the target's reported realization, so prior filings must be reconciled with financial statements, assets and locations before the first post-closing report.
It depends on how complete the seller's data room is and how many licences need regulator verification. The work runs in gates — KBLI and ownership screening first, then corporate-chain reconstruction, then AHU-versus-OSS reconciliation — and the buyer's counsel should set the timeline after scoping the target.
Abigail Yu
Director
Abigail Yu oversees executive leadership at 3E Accounting Group, leading operations, IT solutions, public relations, and digital marketing to drive business success. She holds an honors degree in Communication and New Media from the National University of Singapore and is highly skilled in crisis management, financial communication, and corporate communications.

